logo

Article Details


OTHER

Synthetic Lung Surfactant Treatment for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Frans J. Walther1, * and Alan J. Waring1

1Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA & The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA

Abstract: COVID-19 has led to morbidity in millions of patients, ranging from mild flu-like symptoms to severe respiratory failure, necessitating oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation, and ultimately death. The SARS-CoV-2 virus reacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) molecules that are especially found in alveolar epithelial type 2 cells in the lungs and thereby causes a loss in lung surfactant, a protein-lipid mixture that is crucial for both native immunity and reduction of surface tension in the lung alveoli. Lung surfactant insufficiency results in atelectasis and loss of functional lung tissue amid an inflammatory storm and may be countered by treating COVID-19 pneumonia patients with exogenous lung surfactant, preferably by aerosol delivery of a novel dry powder synthetic lung surfactant. More research on timing, dosing, and delivery of synthetic lung surfactant in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is of crucial importance to implement this approach in clinical practice.

Keywords: lung surfactant, alveolar type 2 cells, respiratory failure, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, pneumonia.


Article Information

Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2021
Volume: 2
Issue: 1
First Page: 8
Last Page: 10
Publisher Id: COVID-2-1-8
DOI: 10.2174/2666796701999201014160428

Article History:

Received Date: June 04, 2020
Revised Date: August 27, 2020
Accepted Date: September 06, 2020

open-access license: This is an Open Access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Pediatrics, The Lundquist Institute, 1124 W Carson Street, Torrance, California, USA; Tel: (310) 974-9592; E-mail: fjwalther@ucla.edu

1. INTRODUCTION

Progress is often made when disaster strikes and out of the box improvisation is sometimes the only way to cope with a life-threatening situation. The current Coronavirus pandemic has led to morbidity in millions of patients, ranging from mild flu-like symptoms to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), necessitating oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation, and ultimately death. The availability of intensive care beds and protective equipment and supplies in the community has quickly become a daily hot issue. Staying at home, keeping social distancing, and wearing facemasks has severely affected our daily lives and the economy, but it is necessary to interrupt the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) in the community until protective vaccines and antiviral drugs become available.

COVID-19 produces an acute viral infection in humans with an incubation time between two and 14 days, and a mean around five days [1]. Common clinical symptoms are fever, cough, fatigue, muscle pain, and dyspnea. In severe cases, rapid onset of respiratory failure occurs around day nine from the onset of clinical symptoms [2]. Specific diagnostics include viral detection with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and imaging of lung pathology with a chest CT scan that typically shows bilateral and peripheral ground-glass opacities and consolidation [3].

SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus. It has a spherical shape, and the spike (S) protein located on the surface of its envelope forms pronounced projections, which, in electron micrographs, create an image reminiscent of a solar corona [4]. Most probably, the S protein, located on the surface of the virus, reacts with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) molecules in the lungs [5], thereby sharing the same cell entry receptor with the SARS-CoV virus. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is genetically closely related to the SARS-CoV virus that led, in 2002-2003, to a novel coronavirus outbreak with a high fatality rate (11%), but this SARS epidemic was contained by implementing strict public health measures. On the contrary, SARS-CoV-2 is less deadly and transmits far more easily than SARs-CoV, thereby leading to the current pandemic [6].

ACE2 is expressed in humans in the epithelia of the lungs, small intestines, heart, liver, and kidneys [7]. In the lungs, ACE2 is especially found in alveolar epithelial type 2 cells. The ACE2 concentration is higher in men than among women and increases with age, which may explain the incidence pattern of COVID-19 pneumonia. Binding of ACE2 to SARS-CoV-2 virus may increase its expression, resulting in damage to the alveoli. The affinity of SARS-CoV-2 for ACE2 is 1-2 times higher than that of SARS-CoV. The expression of ACE2 varies in individuals of different races and leads to differences in susceptibility to clinical illness and in the severity of the disease course [8 - 12]. Following infection, SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the cells of the respiratory and intestinal epithelium, leading to cytopathic changes and associated clinical symptoms. In SARS-CoV-2-infected macaques, virus was detected in alveolar type I and II cells and in ciliated epithelial cells along the respiratory tract [13]. The attack on alveolar type 2 cells by SARS-CoV-2 results in a loss of active surfactant and native immunity.

Alveolar type 2 cells produce and secrete lung surfactant, a mixture of phospholipids and proteins that reduces surface tension at the air-liquid interface in the alveoli. Mammalian lung surfactant consists of approximately 80% phospholipids, 10% neutral lipids, and 10% proteins. Among the four surfactant proteins, surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D) play an important role in the native immunity of the lung, whereas surfactant proteins B and C (SP-B and SP-C) are surface-active and reduce surface tension in the alveoli. The absence of SP-B in the lung is lethal in both humans and mammals [14]. The discovery of surfactant deficiency, as a cause of neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants [15], has been a starting point for the successful treatment of immature preterm infants with intratracheal instillation of exogenous lung surfactant [16]. First generation clinical surfactant preparations were derived from bovine and porcine lungs and consist of surfactant lipids and the surfactant proteins B and C (SP-B and SP-C) [17]. These animal-derived lung surfactants have led to a sharp reduction in morbidity and mortality among preterm infants [16]. More recently, the availability of highly functional SP-B and SP-C analogs has led to the development of advanced synthetic lung surfactants for the treatment of preterm infants with RDS [17].

Direct or indirect injury of alveolar epithelial type 2 cells in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is also associated with lung surfactant deficiency and/or insufficiency by surfactant inactivation. Various studies in animal models and pediatric and adult intensive care patients with ARDS due to bacterial pneumonia and sepsis have shown positive effects of treatment with bovine or porcine lung surfactant [18 - 20]. Although limited availability and high costs of these animal-derived clinical surfactants have hampered their clinical application in ARDS, the development of synthetic lung surfactants with high surface activity has opened a new treatment modality in ARDS and pneumonia [21].

The clinical symptoms of severe respiratory distress due to COVID-19 infection are not unlike ARDS, as seen in severe community and aspiration pneumonia. Autopsies in COVID-19 cases have shown diffuse alveolar damage and lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates in the lungs, consistent with viral-induced early ARDS [22, 23]. Desperation due to the severity and high mortality of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients has led to compassionate use of clinical surfactant in intensive care departments and social media anecdotes of improvements in their clinical status. However, despite comparable symptomatology and pathology, ARDS, due to bacterial pneumonia and COVID-19 viral pneumonia, may not react similarly to a therapeutic intervention like exogenous surfactant administration. This leads to a multitude of questions. Which surfactant preparation may be best and what about timing, mode of administration, and dosing?

So, where to go from here if we want to support COVID-19 pneumonia patients with exogenous surfactant therapy? Surfactant therapy for SARS-CoV-2 viral pneumonia may be given at two time-points during the course of the disease, i.e. (a) during the dyspneic phase to avoid the need for mechanical ventilation or (b) during or soon after intubation for respiratory failure and the start of mechanical ventilation. The first approach might be most effective as it could halt the devastating effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the lung by countering surfactant deficiency and inactivation and the cytokine storm. Various synthetic lung surfactant preparations are available in the research community for this purpose [17]. Among these preparations, a synthetic dry powder lung surfactant developed for aerosol delivery [24] would be most interesting as it can not only be used (or repeated) in stages of early respiratory failure in a non-hospital setting, but also during or after tracheal intubation in the intensive care. Intratracheal delivery of a liquid surfactant preparation, such as the animal-derived surfactant preparations currently used clinically in preterm infants with RDS, requires intubation and will increase the fluid load in airways, which are already battling with lung edema. Dosing is another issue as we only have surfactant dosing schedules for infants and young children (usually 100-200 mg/kg), that provide a huge overload over the 4 mg/kg of endogenous lung surfactant present in healthy adult lungs [25]. Repeated lung doses, equivalent to the surfactant pool size, may theoretically provide enough surfactant to alleviate the burden of surfactant insufficiency in COVID-19 pneumonia.

As shown above, COVID-19 pneumonia patients may benefit considerably from exogenous surfactant treatment. The use of a synthetic dry powder lung surfactant, designed for aerosol delivery, offers the opportunity to start treatment during the early stages of a COVID-19 infection. Surfactant dosing is a pivotal issue for further research as dosing schedules for adults cannot be extrapolated from existing data obtained in newborn infants. There is a crucial need for further research into timing, dosing, and delivery of synthetic lung surfactant treatment in COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

-->

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

FUNDING

This work was financially supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant# INV-001227), Seattle, Washington, USA.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1]
Linton NM, Kobayashi T, Yang Y, et al. Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel Coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J Clin Med 2020; 9(2): 538.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020538]
[2]
Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 55(6): 105948.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105948] [PMID: 32201353]
[3]
Zhao W, Zhong Z, Xie X, Yu Q, Liu J. Relation between chest CT findings and clinical conditions of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: a multicenter study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214(5): 1072-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22976] [PMID: 32125873]
[4]
Wujtewicz M, Dylczyk-Sommer A, Aszkiełowicz A, Zdanowski S, Piwowarczyk S, Owczuk R. COVID-19 - what should anaethesiologists and intensivists know about it? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2020; 52(1): 34-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93756] [PMID: 32191830]
[5]
Deng SQ, Peng HJ. Characteristics of a public health responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. J Clin Med 2020; 9(2): 275.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020575] [PMID: 32093211]
[6]
Petersen E, Koopmans M, Go U, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis 2020.
[7]
Li W, Wong SK, Li F, et al. Animal origins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: insight from ACE2-S-protein interactions. J Virol 2006; 80(9): 4211-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.9.4211-4219.2006] [PMID: 16611880]
[8]
Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020; 367(6483): 1260-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507] [PMID: 32075877]
[9]
Sun P, Lu X, Xu C, Sun W, Pan B. Understanding of COVID-19 based on current evidence. J Med Virol 2020; 92(6): 548-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25722] [PMID: 32096567]
[10]
Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci 2020; 12(1): 8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-0074-x] [PMID: 32094336]
[11]
Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46(4): 586-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9] [PMID: 32125455]
[12]
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor recognition by novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS. J Virol 2020; 94(7): e0012720.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20] [PMID: 31996437]
[13]
Rockx B, Kuiken T, Herfst S, et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 2020; 368(6494): 1012-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7314] [PMID: 32303590]
[14]
Hamvas A, Cole FS, Nogee LM. Genetic disorders of surfactant proteins. Neonatology 2007; 91(4): 311-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000101347] [PMID: 17575475]
[15]
Avery ME, Mead J. Surface properties in relation to atelectasis and hyaline membrane disease. AMA J Dis Child 1959; 97(5): 517-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1959.02070010519001] [PMID: 13649082]
[16]
Polin RA, Carlo WA. Surfactant replacement therapy for preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress. Pediatrics 2014; 133(1): 156-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3443] [PMID: 24379227]
[17]
Walther FJ, Gordon LM, Waring AJ. Advances in synthetic lung surfactant protein technology. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 13(6): 499-501.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2019.1589372] [PMID: 30817233]
[18]
Gregory TJ, Steinberg KP, Spragg R, et al. Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155(4): 1309-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105072] [PMID: 9105072]
[19]
Günther A, Schmidt R, Harodt J, et al. Bronchoscopic administration of bovine natural surfactant in ARDS and septic shock: impact on biophysical and biochemical surfactant properties. Eur Respir J 2002; 19(5): 797-804.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00243302] [PMID: 12030716]
[20]
Wolfler A, Piastra M, Amigoni A, et al. A shared protocol for porcine surfactant use in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a feasibility study. BMC Pediatr 2019; 19(1): 203.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1579-3] [PMID: 31215483]
[21]
Walther FJ, Hernández-Juviel JM, Gordon LM, Waring AJ. Synthetic surfactant containing SP-B and SP-C mimics is superior to single-peptide formulations in rabbits with chemical acute lung injury. PeerJ 2014; 2: e393.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.393] [PMID: 24883253]
[22]
Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, et al. Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173(4): 268-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M20-2003] [PMID: 32374815]
[23]
Wang Y, Lu X, Li Y, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of 344 intensive care patients with COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201(11): 1430-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202003-0736LE] [PMID: 32267160]
[24]
Walther FJ, Gupta M, Lipp MM, et al. Aerosol delivery of dry powder synthetic lung surfactant to surfactant-deficient rabbits and preterm lambs on non-invasive respiratory support. Gates Open Res 2019; 3: 6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12899.2] [PMID: 31131369]
[25]
Rebello CM, Jobe AH, Eisele JW, Ikegami M. Alveolar and tissue surfactant pool sizes in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154(3 Pt 1): 625-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810596] [PMID: 8810596]